5th National Health Sciences Debate (NHSD)
Venue : IMU Bkt Jalil Campus
Date : 9th – 12th December 2006
Theme : α – ω(Alpha-Omega) Health of the Extreme Ages
* α – ω are the first & the last letter in Greek alphabets Debate
Style : British Parliamentary Style
Motions :
1. This House Believes that (THBT) the government should fund palliative treatment for memory loss.
2. THBT all employees medical coverage plan must include a ‘Successful Aging and Wellness Program’
3. This House would (THW) make pre-school education compulsory
4. THW ban genetic predetermination of babies
5. THW continue prescribing Ritalin for ADHD children
6. THBT babies with genetic defects should be aborted
7. THBT sexual assignment for intersexed infants should be decided at adulthood
8. THW set an age cap for practicing clinicians
9. THW vaccinate our children against cervical cancer
10. THBT geriatric care facilities should be government funded
11. THW legalise euthanasia for the elderly
12. THW provide government funding for cosmetic surgery in the elderly - humour round if picked * A humour round is a debate when debaters should make jokes with sense. The team that comes out with most jokes & the most sense wins the round.
So the day has come. 10 of us (5 teams) will be having the first preliminary round in 3 hours time. I am perfectly calm now but I may just get nervous when the round starts and the speaker speaks in a loud/(perceived)threatening/bitchy way that gives me the unwanted tachycardia. But I shall remain calm; our goal is all imu debaters will end up as the top 40 speakes and top 40 teams (I think). The potential embarrasement when the scores are shown on the monitor will be hard to bear. (for me, if I end up really bottom. *sob*)
However, I shall not doubt myself. Ishall not doubt my new partner, Sree. I shall not doubt Prasad and Hai Liang who have put in so much effort in being our mentors. I look up to Hai Liang as the mentor who shows us how to go about debating (because your scores are based on your contributions, if you can rattle off confidently but are out of context etc., you will still lose). Thanks a lot to the whole lot of them!!
Looking back when I just signed up for IMu with the sole thought of participation for experience and earn points of participation for pharmacy, I have come so far in debate (not as in I have improved a lot, but as in how I now can approach the motion, how I try to be structured in my arguments and all). I never regretted joining debate though my academic results turned out to below my expectation. There ain’t many people out there who are willling to share knowledge and experience with you; but IMu debate club is a big family like what deborah said.
From the time we spoke formally till how we now laugh at yih seong’s ‘pseudo flash of brilliance’, prasad and hai liang’s imitation of that-attention-seeking-guy-in-sem-2, to the making fun of deborah’s ‘aishiteru’ to yih seong- we have indeed formed some bonds. I hate to say I have to stop debate next semester due to my academic performance; debate eats brains and I need my rest and revision time. I hope there will be a point I could come back to the club when I succeed in shifting the equilibrium in my academic performance.
Here is to wish ALL the imu teams all the very best; and may at least one teal breaks into the finals. May prasad and hai liang get into top 5 speaker,and may IMU shines in NHSD!!